Today I saw Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. The play is by Tom Stoppard. It was at the Studio Theater. It was directed by Kirk Jackson. I was not amazed. I was not amused. I feel asleep at one point and was so agitated I was in physical pain at another.
According to Wikipedia, "the play concerns the misadventures and musings of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern , two minor characters from William Shakespeares's Hamlet who are friends of the Prince, focusing on their actions while the events of Hamlet occur as background. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is structured as the inverse of Hamlet; the title characters are the leads, not minor players, and Hamlet himself has only a small part. The duo appears on stage here when they are off-stage in Shakespeare's play, with the exception of a few short scenes in which the dramatic events of both plays coincide. In Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are used by the king in an attempt to discover Hamlet's motives and to plot against him. Hamlet, however, mocks them derisively and outwits them, so that they, rather than he, are killed in the end. Thus from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's perspective, the action in Hamlet does not make much sense."
I guess it is meant to be some kind of existentialist statement of some sort. All I know there were a lot of words but precious little sense. No plot. Some character development - but not much.
I have seen other plays by Tom Stoppard performed at the Studio Theater, including Indian Ink and the Invention of Love. I loved those. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern just are not my cup of tea.